Logo

PROS AND CONS OF CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES

  • Contact
  • Educators
  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
On June 27, 2016, the US Supreme Court struck down a 2013 Texas law that added new restrictions to the state’s abortion regulations such as requiring doctors to have admitting privileges in local hospitals and requiring abortion clinics to have the...
View Separately

On June 27, 2016, the US Supreme Court struck down a 2013 Texas law that added new restrictions to the state’s abortion regulations such as requiring doctors to have admitting privileges in local hospitals and requiring abortion clinics to have the same building standards as ambulatory surgical centers. The US Supreme Court found, in a 5-3 decision, that the Texas law violated the constitution by placing unjustified burdens on women’s access to abortion.

US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in the majority opinion that neither of the provisions of the Texas law “confers medical benefits sufficient to justify the burdens upon access that each imposes. Each places a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a previability abortion, each constitutes an undue burden on abortion access… and each violates the Federal Constitution.” In a concurring opinion, US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that “it is beyond rational belief that H. B. 2 [the Texas law] could genuinely protect the health of women… When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners… at great risk to their health and safety.”

According to Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, the Supreme Court ruling in the Texas case “has essentially relegated women to second-class citizens when it comes to abortion by allowing abortionists to evade meeting basic safety standards that are proven to save lives… We must remember why these safety rules were enacted. When abortion facilities are exempt from meeting safety standards, conditions and practices deteriorate and women are placed in jeopardy.”

After the Supreme Court published its decision in the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case, President Obama released a statement praising the decision, writing that he was “pleased to see the Supreme Court protect women’s rights and health today… We remain strongly committed to the protection of women’s health, including protecting a woman’s access to safe, affordable health care and her right to determine her own future.”

Of the 2016 presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson, Bernie Sanders, and Jill Stein, all believe that abortion should remain legal. Donald Trump believes that abortion should no longer be a legal option in the United States.

(via Texas Abortion Law Ruled Unconstitutional by US Supreme Court)

Source: procon.org

    • #texas
    • #abortion
    • #rights
    • #politics
    • #constitution
  • 4 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
← Previous • Next →

Portrait/Logo


ProCon.org

Promoting critical thinking on controversial issues. Researching hotly debated topics and presenting sourced pros and cons, facts, and expert opinions to encourage nonpartisan education and informed citizenship.

ProCon.org Social Links

  • Facebook Profile
  • Instagram Profile
  • Linkedin Profile
  • @ProCon_Org on Twitter
  • ProConOrg on Youtube
ProCon.org Factual Pros & Cons of Controversial Topics
    ECONOMY & TAXES
  • Minimum Wage
  • Gold Standard
  • Insider Trading by Congress
  • Corporate Tax Rate & Jobs
  • Churches and Taxes

  • EDUCATION
  • School Uniforms
  • Standardized Tests
  • Tablets vs. Textbooks
  • College Education Worth It?
  • D.A.R.E. - Good or Bad?
  • Teacher Tenure

  • ELECTIONS & PRESIDENTS
  • 2016 Presidential Election
  • Felon Voting
  • Ronald Reagan
  • Bill Clinton
  • Voting Machines

  • ENTERTAINMENT & SPORTS
  • Social Networking - Good or Bad?
  • Video Games and Violence
  • Drug Use in Sports
  • Golf - Is It a Sport?

  • HEALTH & MEDICINE
  • Birth Control - Should Birth Control Pills Be Available Over-the-Counter?
  • Medical Marijuana
  • Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide
  • Vaccines for Kids
  • Milk - Is It Healthy?
  • Abortion
  • Vegetarianism
  • Obesity a Disease?
  • Obamacare - Good or Bad?
  • Right to Health Care
  • Prescription Drug Ads

  • POLITICS
  • Death Penalty
  • Drinking Age - Lower It?
  • Illegal Immigration
  • Gun Control
  • ACLU - Good or Bad?
  • Concealed Handguns
  • Recreational Marijuana
  • Social Security Privatization
  • Under God in the Pledge

  • SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
  • Animal Testing
  • Cell Phones - Are They Safe?
  • Alternative Energy vs Fossil Fuels
  • Climate Change

  • SEX & GENDER
  • Gay Marriage
  • Prostitution - Legalize it?
  • Born Gay? Origins of Sexual Orientation

  • WORLD / INTERNATIONAL
  • Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
  • Cuba Embargo
  • US Drone Strikes Overseas

  • ARCHIVED
  • 2012 Presidential Election
  • 2008 Presidential Elections
  • 2014 Santa Monica Local Elections
  • US-Iraq War
  • College Football Playoffs
  • WTC Muslim Center
  • Big Three Auto Bailout

  • YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
  • Presidential Election Quiz - Find Your Match
  • Top Jobs of Undocumented Immigrants
  • Legal Recreational Marijuana States and DC
  • Prostitution Policies in 100 Countries
  • History of the Death Penalty
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Mobile

© 2018 ProCon.org All rights reserved.

ProCon Theme by Mich